Go back to Home Page
Latest Updates Page
Stories and Articles Page
The Gallery Page
The Download Page
Leave Feedback Here
Melissa's Filmography Page
Melissa George's Biography
The Site Forum and Interviews Page

This interview was conducted on Tuesday 25th of January 2005, by myself as usual, this time for one of the magazines I work on - Showcase Cinemas Magazine (April / May '05 issue!). Please do not use any part of this interview on any other site without asking permission from me first. DISCLAIMER: The views expressed here are the views of either Melissa George or myself. Any spelling mistakes are my own, and any problems with the interview should be e-mailed to me here. If you see a question that you submitted and would like to be credited, e-mail me about that too on the address above.


H: First of all, I'm sure you're bored of doing this now, but can you give us a quick rundown of what The Amityville Horror is about?

M: It's a remake of the seventies film with Margot Kidder and James Brolin, and it was a true story of what happened in the 70's in a town called Amityville. It's about a man that murdered his whole family, and he said he did it because he heard voices, so this guy is in Jail today. So the house is on the market, and this family buy it - one of which is the character I'm playing, Kathy Lutz - they move in and slowly over 28 days, which is all they lasted in the house, my husband tries to murder myself and the children, as he believes he heard the voices as well. So it's a true story, and Kathy and George Lutz are real people, and it's the story of them living in this house - that's pretty much it.

H: So it's supposedly based on a true story - how much of that do you believe?

M: I think a lot of it is true - for a family to not be in the house any longer than 28 days, and to leave everything behind - something must have happened. They didn't come back for even their personal belongings, so... That to me says that some of it must have been true. I'm sure some elements of it have been exaggerated over time, but then our movie that we're making is also based on new evidence, and new evidence about what really went on, from the coroners and the police, and the real people involved [The original is based purely on Jay Anson's novel 'The Amityville Horror']. So we're almost in a way adding on to the old film.

H: So you don't go for the story that there was a psychosomatic element to what they experienced?

S: I believe that there may be some sort of psychological aspect to it, but... I mean look, some people say they imagined it, but when you read what really went on, I don't think that's the case at all.

H: So, it must have been a scary movie to be taking part in?

M: It was really scary - we had to live the moment, and there were some really tough conditions with the rain and storms and so much action... But this movie is so great because it's not just a slasher film - it's not just running and screaming, that's just a small section of it. It also has this great psychological element to it that's quite disturbing, so there were a lot of great scenes to do.

H: What would you say to somebody who has seen the original version, to persuade them to come and see the remake?

M: Well, our version is very modernized and updated - we're actually showing what happened in the house and I believe we're delivering what the audience will want to see.

H: So will it be an effects-heavy film then?

M: No effects at all, no - all the stunts were real, everything was created on-set.

H: Was it an emotional film to work on?

M: Yeah, emotionally grueling. Because there's this poor family and the mother doesn't know what's happening to her husband and she's trying to keep the kids happy, and keep him happy, and all the while she's discovering all this evil stuff to do with the basement of the house. And she's a very religious woman, so she doesn't believe in demons but then she's forced to realise it's true - so it was a fantastic acting role to get.

H: You're working with Ryan Reynolds in the movie - how was he to work with?

M: Oh brilliant - he made me laugh every second of the day. We were making this horrific film, but there was so much laughter involved, it was wonderful.

H: Presumably in a film such as this you need to keep your spirits up ('scuse the pun!) while not in character?

M: Exactly. But also, when you're working on these very heavy scenes, you've got to be so focused and in to the character, so you don't really muck around too much. But then the beginning quarter of the film is very romantic - George and Kathy are very much in love, and so happy to be buying this house, and they just got married, so there's lots of comedy elements in the beginning parts.

H: So which part do you prefer, the lighthearted parts or the meatier acting?

M: I love all of it, I like to play different ranges. when you get really deeply involved in the emotional parts - I enjoy that just as much as the fun and laughter.

H: Would you do a horror movie again?

M: I think so, yeah - although I think I've pretty much done the best one around at the moment, so who knows. If it was an offer I simply couldn't turn down, then I guess so.

H: You often hear stories about ghostly goings-on around horror movies - did you experience anything out of the ordinary?

M: There were a couple of things, definitely. The first week of filming, the real Kathy Lutz sadly passed away, so that spooked me a bit, and then another night all the lights suddenly turned on in the house for no reason. The police were called, and security came out, but there was nobody at all in the house - we don't know what happened, so that was kinda freaky. Oh and on the second night of filming I woke up at 3:15 in the morning, which is when everybody keeps waking up in the movie - so when you the film you'll understand why that was more than a little spooky.

H: How much of that do you think was down to the expectations everyone has when working on horror films?

M: I guess it could just be the fact that you're playing that kind of role, and bringing that sort of energy to the set - when you're acting you have to try to live the character, so maybe subconsciously you're scaring yourself. Like when the lights thing happened, the first thing you think of is that it must be something to do with the story, whereas normally you may just conclude it was some electrical problem. But the set and the whole crew were all a little bit more aware, their fear was a little bit heightened.

H: So does that heightened edge make it easier to act the part?

M: Yeah it does. But you know, the part I enjoy about acting is just having that imagination - taking your mind to a place that your wouldn't normally necessarily go to. So I enjoy just imagining the scary elements anyway. No matter what the character is, I just say to myself 'If I, Melissa George, was in that situation, how would I react?' and once you do that you can just go for it, and hopefully the performance comes through.

H: I'm very much looking forward to seeing it.

M: Yeah, I can't wait! The trailer has just been cut, and I'm very happy. Hopefully it'll do well, though you never know with movies, whether they open up on the right weekend or not - you just need a bit of movie magic now. I've done the best I can, and the director's up for a DGA (Director's Guild America) this weekend, so hopefully it will all come together.

H: You're next movie project after Amityville is Derailed - can you tell us a bit about that?

M: It's based on the book of the same name, and it's actually a story about the authors life [as an advertising creative]. It stars Clive Owen and Myself, Jennifer Aniston and Vincent Cassell, and it's a story about a man whose life is falling apart. It was an honour to be asked to play his wife, and basically he's on the train to work one day and it gets derailed, and so does his life and that of the people around him. It's beautifully directed by Mikael Håfström, who's a great director - he did a wonderful Swedish movie, called 'Evil' and he was great to work with.

H: When is Derailed scheduled for release?

M: Around August I believe.

H: So was Derailed an enjoyable movie to work on?

M: For me, it was a great, mature role. The story is that they got marriage when they were teenagers, so they've been together so long, and they have this daughter who is not at all well - their marriage is basically falling apart. So for me it was a good acting piece - nothing fluffy about it. It was really dramatic, very mature - I had to grow up a little bit to play it. But I really enjoyed it.

H: Derailed is based on a novel - do you know how close it sticks to the story from the book?

M: I think it's pretty close. Although my character is a little bigger than she is in the book, apparently, so it's great for me. It started out quite small, but then I ended up having about a third of the work to do in the film, so it was pretty great.

H: Did you get to work a lot with Vincent Cassell and Jennifer Aniston, or is it mainly with Clive Owen?

M: Mainly with Clive, and I did some things with Vincent, but with Jennifer, No.

H: It sounds like you've got some great movies coming out?

M: All I know is that in my opinion, Amityville and Derailed are two of the best scripts out this year, so I'm very lucky. When I got both of those jobs I was like 'Oh my god, this is too great!'

H: So you got them both at a similar sort of time?

M: Yeah, I was up for both, and I got Amityville first. Then while I was filming I got a call from the people at Miramax saying 'We want you to be in Derailed as well' - and I had to leave 8 hours after we wrapped on Amityville! I was in this tank drowning and all I could think about was 'Oh my god, I have to be in London tomorrow for Derailed'. So on the plane over to the UK, I was doing a lot of cleansing - trying to get rid of the evils of Amityville. I literally used that plane journey to try to erase from my mind the difficult, harrowing experience of the character in Amityville, just trying to dissolve it. And then I'm in the UK, on set with Clive Owen for a month and a half, thinking to myself 'This is fantastic!'

H: Was it hard going from playing a 70's character to a more modern-day role?

M: I was a little, yes. But then I think I was so well oiled from Amityville, it was easier trying to interpret the change. And of course the character in Amityville was a mother trying to keep the family and her marriage together, and my character in Derailed was also a wife and mother going through similar experiences. I thought it was going to be difficult, but being in London and having such a great director, it seemed to work out really well.

H: Are you a little concerned at all that you might become stereotyped in these mothery roles?

M: Oh gosh, well Amityville was set in the 70's, and back then my mother had had three children by the time she was 23, so that's fine by me. And then you look at Angelina Jolie, who player Colin Farrell's mother in Alexander - it doesn't even matter, do you know what I mean? The roles that I'm getting... Amityville for instance, she's not a 'mother' role, it's a strong woman who ends up being the hero of the film. And then Derailed was offered to me, and you don't turn down the chance to star opposite Clive Owen, regardless of the character! There were concerns that I wasn't old enough to play the role, but at the end of the day, you can play any age, any character you want to. Some people have been saying 'It's very new for you to be playing the role of wife and mother', but I have to point out that in Home and Away I was 16 with two children - that was twelve years ago, so you can probably see what I mean.

H: Has playing a mother made you feel broody at all?

M: No, not too much. Not at all actually! I think looking at my husband makes me feel broody, but not so much the working with children.

H: How were the children to work with?

M: Oh, just wondeful, really great. We were so freezing cold, the kids and myself on the roof on that set, with rain machines - it was zero degrees in Chicago. But the children were incredible, so professional.

H: Before these latest two movies you spent some time on the US show ALIAS. Do you have any plans to return?

M: You know, there's discussion about it, sure - it would be great, and the show is just rating through the roof this year. I'm not sure though. Doing movies is one of the things I love, and I'll be pretty busy with publicity for both of these for the next few months, so who knows?

H: How did Andrew Douglas compare to other directors you've worked with, like Soderbergh and Lynch?

M: Pretty much the same - he's just a genius! So is Mikael Håfström. I've been blessed, absolutely blessed - people wanted to meet me this week for meetings, just based on the directors I've worked with. I've been so lucky, the directors I've worked with have been so gifted and incredibly talented.

H: So, what's up next for you in 2005?

M: No firm plans, but all I know at the moment is I'm on a big publicity trail for both movies, and then trying to figure out when I can go back to Chile - because my husband is directing his first movie, starting tomorrow. I hope to go back to Buenos Aries, and hang out there for a little bit too - I've been studying Spanish. That has been sooooo difficult...

END